<img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-177" src="http://stalberg.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-website-banner-300x100.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="100" />

I presented at the global earth repair conference in Port Townsend, Washington earlier this month. The event was certainly groundbreaking with some six-hundred attendees and over sixty presentations. The conference was not a scientific conference and while there was a good deal of sound information based on well understood and proven practices, there was  also some information presented which was notably disturbing.

Some speakers were ridiculing current scientific consensus on the necessity of bringing down atmospheric CO2 levels and instead were advocating for altering the earth's hydrologic cycle through ecosystem restoration as the most important task in face of the present climate emergency. This theory is <a href="http://www.regenagscience.org/2019/03/03/the-carbon-controversy-of-christine-jones/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">controversial at best</a> and I am not aware of any peer-reviewed science supporting this theory and in fact there exist cogent <a href="https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2008/02/common-climate-misconceptions-the-water-vapor-feedback-2/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">arguments disputing this notion</a>.

This in no way is to diminish the importance of ecosystem restoration and the valuable contribution made to society by this conference. That said, I felt it was wholly irresponsible and dangerous to diminish the importance of the necessity for us to to limit GHG emissions. This for me was a blemish on what was otherwise a superb forum around a key topic.